Presenting Wales from A to Y. The People, the Places, the Traditions An Alphabetical Guide To A Nation's Heritage

Book Description

The people who have contributed to the history of Wales, both home and abroad and the most important places of wales arranged alphabetically from a through z. Just about everyone important in the history, culture and political and industrial development of this small nation are inlcuded as well as places of cultural and historical importance.

Customer Reviews:

A good introduction to Global Environmentalism.......2006-07-07

Guha's book is a short, but very well written book about the history of the Environmentalism movement. The Industrial Revolution, which began in England, soon brought writers and intellectuals to speak out against what they saw as the destruction of the world around them and the abuse of the natural resources of the land.

Guha writes about the beginnings of American environmentalism and the need for national parks and even argues that American parks were built more for nationalistic reasons than for really wanting to preserve the lands in the United States.

The book also takes on the growing problems of "South" nations who want to grow economically and technologically while "North" nations (typically very industrialized nations) fear this since it will mean more pollution and more problems in the world.

The book is a good primer on the history of Environmentalism and the difficulty that nations face as the populations continue to increase while the earth's resources continue to be depleted.

Environtalism:a Global history.......2001-02-20

This book covers first wave and second wave of envoronmentalism. First wave is the initial response to the industrialisation. IT is expressed first by poets and writers such as wordsworth,ruskin,morris and carpenter.They gave message of simple life.Saint Gandhi gave the best known aphorism 'the world has enough for everybody's need but not enough for everybody's greed'. It is expressed secondly by ideology of scientific conservation.Here George Perkins,Marsh and Dietrich Brandis were forefront for scientific movement.Thirdly there is wilderness idea.It is the conservation of wild species and wild animals. John Muir is of the opinon that 'nature had a right to be cared for regardless of anybody's bank balance and any counrries gposs national product.Aldo Lopold was in favour of maintaining diverse flora and fauna.There are three other envoronmentalist as Patrick Geddes who gave a ohrase 'carboniferous capitalism' for the dependence of industrial city on fossil fuels and tremendous pollution. Lewis Mumford,american historian wished that society would restore three disturbed equilibrium: equilibrium between city and village;the equilibrium in population by balancing birth and death rates;the equilibrium between humans and nature.Radhachand Mukherjee social scientist insisted that any social group must be considered in relation to the interwoven chain of biotic communities. Second wave of environmentalism was started from 1962.After world war II America wasknown as 'affluent society' the period was known as 'development decade' but here ecological constraint to economical growth was regarded irrevelent so the period was known as 'ecological innocence'. After this phase, there is actual mass movement took place.It was stimulated by the book'Silent Spring' by Rachael Carson . It explained that there are intimate and essential relations between planta and plants;between plants and other plants;between plants and animals,that nature was in sum, an intricate web of life whose interwoven strands lead from microbes to man. In America there is wilderness movement known as 'Deep Ecology',then there is German green movement,Narmada bachao andolan and chipko'hug a tree' movement in India.In Thailand,there is ordination ceremony to protest forests.In Nigeria, movement fof survival of ogoni people and territories.In Kenya,Green belt movement. In Brazil,AGAPAN environmental initiative and chico mendes labour organiser promoted ecolgy and justice. Lastly it gives about international organisation such as world wildlife fund [WWF] in assisi and UNCED held at stokholm in 1972 and at Rio de janero in 1992.

Global Anarchy in the Third Millennium?: Race, Place and Power at the End of the Modern Age

Average customer rating:

Global Anarchy in the Third Millennium?: Race, Place and Power at the End of the Modern Age
Joseph Wayne Smith , Graham Lyons , and Evonne Moore
Manufacturer: Palgrave Macmillan
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

Economic Conditions | Economics | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Natural Resources | Economics | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

Economic Conditions | International | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

General | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

History & Theory | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Conservation | Environment | Outdoors & Nature | Subjects | Books

General | Business & Finance | New & Used Textbooks | Stores | Books

Book Description

In a vision of apocalyptic pessimism, this critical examination explores the multitude of economic, environmental, and social problems facing human civilization. A global situation of "planetary overload" has made our world alien, hostile, and increasingly out of control, distant from human culture and communities, and approaching a point of critical instability, after which a breakdown of civilization occurs.

Global Meltdown: Immigration, Multiculturalism, and National Breakdown in the New World Disorder

Average customer rating:

Global Meltdown: Immigration, Multiculturalism, and National Breakdown in the New World Disorder
Joseph Wayne Smith , Graham Lyons , and Evonne Moore
Manufacturer: Praeger Publishers
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Popular Economics | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books

History & Theory | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Practical Politics | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

General | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Human Geography | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Environmental Science | Earth Sciences | Science | Subjects | Books

General | Nature & Ecology | Science | Subjects | Books

Geography | Social Sciences | New & Used Textbooks | Stores | Books

Earth Sciences | Sciences | New & Used Textbooks | Stores | Books
ASIN: 0275956008

Book Description

The modern world is, in the authors' view, undergoing the process of meltdown--global meltdown. Having argued in an earlier book that humankind is headed for an environmental catastrophe that will either eliminate the human species or greatly reduce our numbers, the authors now focus on the breakdown of organized social order that will occur when the ecological crisis happens. Believing that civilization as we know it will not last, even without a definitive environmental cataclysm, they explore here the social, political, and philosophical ramifications of this vision. After outlining the interaction of the forces of environmental destruction, economic rationalism, and technological revolution, this book shows their impact on social problems such as immigration, racial and ethnic conflict, and the loss of personal, spiritual, and religious meaning. In the first chapter, the authors consider the effects of these social conflicts in both the non-Western and the Western world, concluding that the global meltdown theory is supported by the worldwide rise of terrorism. Chapter 2 discusses the technological and ecological forces they believe will led to a "new world disorder." The work then goes on to use Australia as a case study illustrating the collision of population and environment. In the concluding chapter, the authors support their thesis further with a review of the literature on the subject.

Recent Representations in Popular Environmental Discourse: Individualism Wastefulness and the Global Economy [*].: An article from: The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology

Average customer rating:

Recent Representations in Popular Environmental Discourse: Individualism Wastefulness and the Global Economy [*].: An article from: The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology
Glenda Wall
Manufacturer: Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Assn.
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital

Book Description

This digital document is an article from The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, published by Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Assn. on August 1, 2000. The length of the article is 7853 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Recent Representations in Popular Environmental Discourse: Individualism Wastefulness and the Global Economy [*].
Author: Glenda Wall
Publication: The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology (Refereed)
Date: August 1, 2000
Publisher: Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Assn.
Volume: 37 Issue: 3 Page: 249

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Average customer rating:

Environmentalism: A Global History
Ramachandra Guha
Manufacturer: Longman
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OUFUC4

Book Description

Recorded history is a finely-woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the sixteenth century. There is not a single piece of evidence that can be reliably and independently traced back earlier than the eleventh century. This book details events that are substantiated by hard facts and logic, and validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient sources.

Customer Reviews:

Calculations are only as good as your numbers.......2007-08-03

Yes, we can all agree that mainstream history is nearly 100% BS due to politics, economics, ego, problems with dating techniques, and various conspiracies. Agreed. But, I've been researching the distinct possibility that human history (in terms of civilizations) are much more ancient than we've been told, so coming across this book was very interesting to me. I wondered how Fomenko could be wrong (if at all) because he is very persuasive in his presentations. Then it dawned on me. If at previous times in prehistory, due to the various catastrophies that are well documented (comets, asteroids, planetary disruptions, plasma discharge, pole reversals, etc) the Earth was in a different position in relation to the sun, different tilt on its axis, different orbit, different rotation (in terms of velocity and DIRECTION), and the continents were in different positions, then would this not cause the ancients to see the sky (constellations) differently? In other words, is Fomenko making erronious assumptions about the physics of the Earth in pre-history, which then corrupt his data with regards to dating the relevant astrology? The last event to seriously disrupt our planet occured roughly 3500 years ago, according to other good researchers, so is it possible Fomenko has been confused by this? The vastly different physics of our planet in the not so distant past may explain this confusion, which is not to say the "mainstream" version of history is correct; on the contrary. I am not an expert in these fields, but wanted to see if this idea could spark discussion.

Pants on fire?.......2007-07-19

Will people ever read before spamming? Yes, Jesuits could not rewrite world history alone, they had help. Anyway, Dr Prof Acad A.Fomenko does not point to jesuits as the driving force of world wide history manipulation in published volumes 1,2,3;, actually he barely mentions the poor devils. Check it with 'Search inside' feature, please. China is rarely mentioned either, in fact, Dr Fomenko is completely eurocentric. Right, his theory contradicts all mainstream schools of history, because in their actual state they are all built on blatantly erroneus chronology. You don't need a mysterious cabal (conspiracy) to falsify history, the falsification is its modus operandi. It is inherent to history(ians) to falsify (distort) events, as it is inherent to humans to boast as it is inherent to power (authority) to legimize itself by referrring to glorious past made to its own order. Dr Prof Fomenko and team have identified scores of instances of such manipulation in Russian, European, etc.. history, and delivered valid statistical proof thereof. His own 'reconstruction' is completely another story. Forget c14 as a valid method of dating. W.Libby has initially discovered a brilliant method of INDEPENDENT dating. Too bad, c14 method has become a joke after a forced marrige with dendrochronology with consensual chronological scale inbuilt. Radiocarbon method can't stand blind tests, but is so very productive as a rubberstamp.

Accepted History & Chronology Must Be Changed. .......2007-04-09

There is no doubt that history as most know it is a sham, & institution's version of History both University & Church is fradulent & inaccurate. Everything was established with an agenda, The real "Dark Ages" are now when we have access to incredible amounts of information past authorities & more important 'common folk' didn't have but our institutions & educators are slow to evolve because of what has ignorantly & arrogantly been taught for too long. This is on many subjects not just Chronology.

For anyone to question "Why would a Mathematician have anything credible to say of History?" The answer is from Dr. Fomenko's preface in the book: "It would be worthwhile to remind the reader that in the XVI-XVII century Chronology was considered to be a subdivision of Mathematics." These volumes could possibly be some of the most important works to date & should be read by everyone with an interest in History, especially professors & educators who have a duty to the public. I have read both books & must say that 'Chronology 1' has some very eye opening & revolutionary information. Even if these volumes are part true the implications are profound & opens the doors to further investigations & questions which must be done. I speak several different lanquages & must say the logic Dr. Fomenko uses with "inflection" of words & words being read from left to right in one region & right to left in another then written backwards, the removal of vowels & get down to basics of words, or different cities & locations having the same name etc. is correct. Vowel usage has always been optional & varied, actually complicating linquistics & study. The first thing one has to understand is that words never had a fixed spelling in history like we do now, the spelling of words was mutable & regional, as well as names & titles of people were vast, varied & changed, NOTHING WAS FIXED or understood linear. Matters of Life & Death as well as financial profiteering yesterday & today were & are made with ignorant, illogical & conspiratorial views of history & reality, it's time people get closer to the Truth & society collectively grow up.

Very Interesting.......2007-03-07

It is a good proposal and I believe it will mature into something even better in the future. I think it deserves to be read.

History as Science Fiction.......2007-01-10

Anatoly Fomenko has written a very intriguing book, full of pictures, charts, and computer 'proof' of his thesis: backwards of AD900 we don't really know what happened or when. Between AD900 and AD1600 there is more certainty, but there is still a lot of fuzzy ground, and things don't get reliable until we get past the 1600's where the printing press made it very difficult for the perpetrators of this timeline manipulation to change anything that had been committed to print. The Dark Ages did not happen. Books were burned for a reason. One organization has doubled the actual length of its existence by expanding the real chronology. Read why.

I had always wondered why Christ died about AD33 and yet men waited until the 11th century to form the Knights Templar, the Cathars, etc and go after the Holy Land by force. Why the 1000 year gap? Turns out there wasn't more than a 10-12 year gap and he proves it using astronomy. This also implies that the planet is not as old as we have been told, and current Christian and other creationist scientists are already championing that idea without being aware of Fomenko's book. The two groups, creationist scientists and the Russian mathematical analysts corroborate each other. Fascinating.

Of course, all this flies in the face of what we have been told traditionally is the 'proper' chronology of western civilization, and most readers will experience 'cognitive dissonance' in reading this book. It means that our history going backwards from AD1600 becomes progressively more incorrect and unreliable until it cannot be trusted at all... in the space of 700-800 years.

Naturally, the curious, open-minded reader will want to know WHO did this, WHY, and did any of the events we think of as really ancient ever happen?
Dr. Fomenko is a respected scientist/mathematician at Moscow State University who has already answered these questions to the satisfaction of his initially skeptical colleagues. Most of them are now believers, a few still refuse to believe (the usual diehards), and of course the western press has ignored Fomenko's work -- for obvious reasons when you read the book. The ones who perpetrated this chronology ruse have a lot to answer for. They are still with us. That's why this book is a well-kept secret.

I gave the book a 4-star rating because I was unable to check out some of his claims; those I checked were as he said. But if even 1/3 of his claims are true, this punches a big hole in what we think is our history, the meaning of western civilization, our educational process (for repeating the ruse as gospel), and the trustworthiness of the organization that perpetrated this ruse, well-intentioned or not.

This book relates to current research into a Young Earth paradigm, to John Keel's discoveries about our planet, and Fr Malachi Martin's insights (in his now out-of-print books). We are indeed sheep who are manipulated and kept ignorant -- for a reason. While knowing what these men have to say may be the "booby prize" (as in: 'what can you do with this knowledge?'), it will provide interesting reading. Didn't someone say: "...and the Truth will set you free."?? For you to judge if this book contains the truth.

Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific Discovery

Average customer rating:

Science's Seamy Side

Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific Discovery
John Waller
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Science | Subjects | Books

General | History & Philosophy | Science | Subjects | Books

History of Science | History & Philosophy | Science | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0198609396

Book Description

The great biologist Louis Pasteur suppressed 'awkward' data because it didn't support the case he was making. John Snow, the 'first epidemiologist' was doing nothing others had not done before. Gregor Mendel, the supposed 'founder of genetics' never grasped the fundamental principles of 'Mendelian' genetics. Joseph Lister's famously clean hospital wards were actually notorious dirty. And Einstein's general relativity was only 'confirmed' in 1919 because an eminent British scientist cooked his figures. These are just some of the revelations explored in this book. Drawing on current history of science scholarship, Fabulous Science shows that many of our greatest heroes of science were less than honest about their experimental data and not above using friends in high places to help get their ideas accepted. It also reveals that the alleged revolutionaries of the history of science were often nothing of the sort. Prodigiously able they may have been, but the epithet of the 'man before his time' usually obscures vital contributions made their unsung contemporaries and the intrinsic merits of ideas they overturned. These distortions of the historical record mostly arise from our tendency to read the present back into the past. But in many cases, scientists owe their immortality to a combination of astonishing effrontery and their skills as self-promoters.

Customer Reviews:

Science's Seamy Side.......2006-02-09

The science establishment admits that science is an `industry' exposed to market pressures: relentless demand for usable output, the need to promote its products and to parry bad publicity, the need to reconcile conflicts of interest between marketable research outcomes and validity of those outcomes (especially acute in the pharmaceutical industry). Today bogus science so widespread that the catchphrase `junk science' has become a label to nullify the prestige of the `science' label adeptly used to recruit the credibility of the naïve or the uninformed. Another effect is the nearly universal institution of codes of conduct to for scientists.

Waller bypasses this contemporary territory to come at his theme in a series of case studies of historically high profile achievements that have proved to be somewhat inflated, or outright `fabulous'. Among his cases are Louis Pasteur's disproof of spontaneous generation, Arthur Eddington's experimental proof of Einstein's general relativity theory, Joseph Lister's introduction of surgical antisepsis; Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin, Robert Millikan's discovery of the electron, and Darwin's `proof' of evolution. In each case the author identifies the legend to be corrected and then takes us inside the story of what actually happened. We are shown something of the personalities of the scientists involved and their motivation. The lesson concludes with guesses about why they behaved as they did and how they got away with it. I'll mention just one of Waller's cases.

It is the famous debate between Bishop Samuel Wilberforce and Thomas Huxley at a session of the 1860 British Association for the Advancement of Science, held in Oxford. According to legend, the encounter occurred before a packed auditorium filled by anticipation of a confrontation between the eloquent Wilberforce, defending the permanence of species, and Huxley, defending evolution. Legend says that Wilberforce displayed his ignorance of Darwin's theory and was trounced and humiliated by the acerbic Huxley. The legendary debate condenses to an aphorism: Wilberforce taunted Huxley with the question whether he was descended from the ape on his father's side or his mother's side, to which Huxley retorted that he would rather be descended from an ape than from an august authority who abused his trust to obfuscate the truth. The devastating reply shifted the audience from partiality to the orthodox view to up-and-coming evolutionism. This had the larger significance that, for the first time, science openly challenged religion and proclaimed the two modes of thought must go separate ways. As Hallam puts it: `The [debate] ...was a landmark in the victory of scientific reason over faith and obfuscation. At least that is how Huxley & Co saw it. Were they right? Well, not exactly.'

First slippage: three journalists reported the session, but none mentioned the Wilberforce ape ancestry challenge and the Huxley rejoinder. Indeed, Huxley had said in previous conference sessions that he was not ashamed to admit his pithacoid ancestry. Second slippage: the `inextinguishable laughter' from the audience that Huxley, in correspondence, boasted that his retort produced is not reported by the journalists or others who commented on the event. These sources include Darwin's supporters Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker. Third slippage: the session was not billed as a debate between Huxley and Wilberforce, but as a paper on the historical conflict between science and religion by one Dr John Draper, to be followed by open discussion. The audience expected Wilberforce to speak, but not Huxley, who attended the meeting only on a last minute decision. Fourth slippage: According to a statement in correspondence shortly after the event, Huxley's argument was not particularly effective or audible to the large audience. Wilberforce was indeed put down, but by botanist Joseph Hooker. The source? Joseph Hooker in a letter to Darwin! Fifth slippage: there is no record of what Wilberforce said, but we do have his review of the Origin that appeared shortly after the Oxford meeting. There he shows himself well acquainted with Darwin's book. Invoking his ecclesiastical office, he expressly defended Darwin's right to be heard. He accepted the principle of natural selection, but says that it is a well-known principle of species conservation (by eliminating the maladapted). He argued that Darwin simply recycled the opinions of his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin. Sixth slippage: Wilberforce's comments on the session express satisfaction that he had met the challenge handsomely. Waller's conclusion: Huxley's boastful letter, on which the legend is based, was a `face-saving device' of a man so immobilized by anger that he couldn't effectively speak. So Huxley was fibbing. In particular, his contention that Wilberforce engaged in deliberate obfuscation is unfounded. Waller concludes that the audience was fairly evenly divided between the two sides, each confident in its opinion. My own investigation of this debate reached the same conclusion, but with one difference: that it occurred at all, under British Association auspices, was a landmark in the transition to public acceptance of evolution. In that sense, the legend communicates a historical truth, but dressed in the mystique of the Darwin cult.

Fabulous Science a readable expedition into the exotic world of how science happens. Definitely merits a place on your wish list.

Books:

Books Index

Books Home

Recommended Books