A physician's counsels to his professional brethren. By a practising physician.

Average customer rating:
A physician's counsels to his professional brethren. By a practising physician.
Michigan Historical Reprint Series
Manufacturer: Scholarly Publishing Office, University of Michigan Library
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

General | United States | Americas | History | Subjects | Books
United States | History | Historical Reproductions | Formats | Books
ASIN: 1425507298
Release Date: 2005-12-20

Product Description

This volume is produced from digital images created through the University of Michigan University Library's preservation reformatting program.

The pilgrim church,: Being some account of the continuance through succeeding centuries of churches practising the principles taught and exemplified in the New Testament,

Average customer rating:

The pilgrim church,: Being some account of the continuance through succeeding centuries of churches practising the principles taught and exemplified in the New Testament,
E. H Broadbent
Manufacturer: Pickering & Inglis
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding

Average customer rating:

"Practising Chemists"
R.C. Chirnside , and J.H. Hamence
Manufacturer: The Royal Society of Chemistry
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

Analytic | Chemistry | Science | Subjects | Books

General | History & Philosophy | Science | Subjects | Books

Practising Colonial Medicine: The Colonial Medical Service in British East Africa

Average customer rating:

Practising Colonial Medicine: The Colonial Medical Service in British East Africa
Anna Crozier
Manufacturer: I. B. Tauris
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Africa | History | Subjects | Books

General | World | History | Subjects | Books

General | Medicine | Subjects | Books

History | Special Topics | Medicine | Subjects | Books

Book Description

This unique study is based on original sources and research into the work of doctors who served in East Africa. Anna Crozier analyses all aspects of recruitment, qualifications, training as well as the vital personal factors that shaped the Service’s character. This is the first comprehensive history of the Colonial Medical Service and makes an important contribution to our understanding of the social and cultural aspects of medical history.

Practising Femininity: Domestic Realism and the Performance of Gender in Early Canadian Fiction (Theory / Culture)

Average customer rating:

Practising Femininity: Domestic Realism and the Performance of Gender in Early Canadian Fiction (Theory / Culture)
Misao Dean
Manufacturer: University of Toronto Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

Women Writers & Feminist Theory | Books & Reading | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

General | Women's Studies | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Women Writers | Women's Studies | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 080208138X

Average customer rating:

Practising History
Barbara W. Tuchman
Manufacturer: Papermac
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

Historiography | Historical Study | History | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0333498259

Practising Places: Saint Teresa, Lazarillo and the Early Modern City. (Portada Hispánica 10) (Portada Hispanica)

Average customer rating:

Practising Places: Saint Teresa, Lazarillo and the Early Modern City. (Portada Hispánica 10) (Portada Hispanica)
Mercedes Maroto Camino
Manufacturer: Editions Rodopi B.V.
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

Spain | Europe | History | Subjects | Books

General | Arts & Photography | Subjects | Books

Book Description

Practising Places offers an original insight into the culture of early modern Spain in so far as the various fields explored here are seldom juxtaposed. Literary texts, urban views and paintings are analysed side by side in a hybrid cultural interpretation that is as cartographic as it is architectural, historical or literary.
This book presents a "thick" description which focuses on the first picaresque novel, Lazarillo de Tormes, the autobiographical writing of Teresa of Avila, and the urban views of Spanish towns drafted or painted by Joris Hoefnagel, Anton Van den Wyngaerde and El Greco. These works embody and challenge the sense of grandeur and subsequent notion of crisis, which inhere in the period. In this way, they simultaneously highlight and question the centralism and social control of the absolutist Habsburg rules, illustrating the claim that space is as much a social product as a social producer.
Mercedes Maroto Camino is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Auckland, where she specialises in the early modern period. She has published widely in the areas of women's writing, history of cartography, colonialism and the comedia. Her previous book was published by The Edwin Mellen Press and her articles have appeared in journals such as Hispanic Review, Revista Canadiense de Estudios HispÁnicos, Cartographica, Parergon, Spenser Studies, Forum for Modern Language Studies and Bulletin of the Comediantes.

Practising Reform in Montaigne's Essais (Brill's Studies in Intellectual History)

Average customer rating:

Practising Reform in Montaigne's Essais (Brill's Studies in Intellectual History)
Dorothea B. Heitsch
Manufacturer: Brill Academic Publishers
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | World | History | Subjects | Books

Renaissance | World | History | Subjects | Books

History of Ideas | Historical Study | History | Subjects | Books

General | Interior Design | Home & Garden | Subjects | Books

General | Essays | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

Classics | General | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

All Titles | Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007 | Stores | Books
ASIN: 9004116303

Practising Translation in Renaissance France: The Example of Etienne Dolet (Oxford Modern Languages and Literature Monographs)

Average customer rating:

Practising Translation in Renaissance France: The Example of Etienne Dolet (Oxford Modern Languages and Literature Monographs)
Valerie Worth
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Europe | History | Subjects | Books

French | World Literature | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

Translating | Words & Language | Reference | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0198158181

Book Description

Translation was one important aspect of the concept of imitatio - the imitation of classical models - which dominated the literary scene in the Renaissance. This first-ever study of the practice, as opposed to the theory, of translation among French writers of that period, takes as its exemplar the humanist scholar and publisher Etienne Dolet (1509-46). Author of the first theoretical treatise on the subject, Dolet also undertook many translations himself, the last of which - the pseudo-Platonic Axiochus - was used against him as evidence of heterodox thought. Dolet's death at the stake is a reminder that translation could be a dangerous occupation; in demonstrating its relation to the intellectual and political controversies of the time, this study is an original and significant contribution to sixteenth-century French studies.

Practising the virtues of amiability and civility in pride and prejudice. (Conference Papers).(Critical Essay): An article from: Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal

Average customer rating:

Practising the virtues of amiability and civility in pride and prejudice. (Conference Papers).(Critical Essay): An article from: Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal
Sarah Emsley
Manufacturer: Jane Austen Society of North America
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal, published by Jane Austen Society of North America on January 1, 2000. The length of the article is 4609 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Practising the virtues of amiability and civility in pride and prejudice. (Conference Papers).(Critical Essay)
Author: Sarah Emsley
Publication: Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2000
Publisher: Jane Austen Society of North America
Volume: 22 Page: 187(12)

Article Type: Critical Essay

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Average customer rating:
The I. F. Stone's weekly reader
I. F Stone
Manufacturer: Random House
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding

United States | Americas | History | Subjects | Books | 19th Century | 20th Century | 21st Century | African Americans | Civil War | Colonial Period | General | Revolution & Founding | State & Local
General | World | History | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0394488156

Average customer rating:
The I. F. Stone's Weekly Reader
Neil, editor Middletown
Manufacturer: Random House, 1973
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: B000J0U2YU

Average customer rating:
The I. F. Stone's Weekly Reader

Manufacturer: Radom House
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: B000I8D9H0

Average customer rating:
I.F. Stone's Weekly: A Reader
I.F. Stone
Manufacturer: PublicAffairs,U.S.
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: B000KYMAFY

Average customer rating:

A popularity contest for ideas

An excellent treaty on critical thinking

Shermer Ruins the Book by Talking Too Much

An Excellent Primer on Critical Thinking

Very well arranged

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense
Michael Shermer
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

General | Mental Health | Health, Mind & Body | Subjects | Books
Controversial Knowledge | Religious Studies | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books
Parapsychology | Occult | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books
Unexplained Mysteries | Occult | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books
General | Science | Subjects | Books
General | History & Philosophy | Science | Subjects | Books
History of Science | History & Philosophy | Science | Subjects | Books
Similar Items:

Science Friction: Where the Known Meets the Unknown

How We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God (second edition)

Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time

The Science of Good and Evil : Why People Cheat, Gossip, Care, Share, and Follow the Golden Rule

Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud

ASIN: 0195143264

Book Description

As author of the bestselling Why People Believe Weird Things and How We Believe, and Editor-in-Chief of Skeptic magazine, Michael Shermer has emerged as the nation's number one scourge of superstition and bad science. Now, in The Borderlands of Science, he takes us to the place where real science (such as the big bang theory), borderland science (superstring theory), and just plain nonsense (Big Foot) collide with one another. Shermer argues that science is the best lens through which to view the world, but he recognizes that it's often difficult for most of us to tell where valid science leaves off and borderland science begins. To help us, Shermer looks at a range of topics that put the boundary line in high relief. For instance, he discusses the many "theories of everything" that try to reduce the complexity of the world to a single principle, and shows how most fall into the category of pseudoscience. He examines the work of Darwin and Freud, explaining why one is among the great scientists in history, while the other has become nothing more than a historical curiosity. He also shows how Carl Sagan's life exemplified the struggle we all face to find a balance between being open-minded enough to recognize radical new ideas but not so open-minded that our brains fall out. And finally, he reveals how scientists themselves can be led astray, as seen in the infamous Piltdown Hoax. Michael Shermer's enlightening volume will be a valuable aid to anyone bewildered by the many scientific theories swirling about. It will help us stay grounded in common sense as we try to evaluate everything from SETI and acupuncture to hypnosis and cloning.

Customer Reviews:

A popularity contest for ideas.......2006-07-17

Shermer's book is an attempt to classify various lines of research into science, nonscience, and `borderlands' science, but he follows no rigorous methodology. Instead, he subjectively classifies various theories, practices, and lines of research into his three categories, based upon how popular certain theories are among mainstream scientists, and how much the theories, practices, and lines of research appeal to his narrow scientific fundamentalism.

There really is no need for this book. The celebrated philosopher Karl Popper brilliantly solved the problem of the demarcation between science, and philosophy, ideology and nonsense decades ago, and his work has been endorsed by scientists from Einstein to Hawkings. The criterion is testability. Scientific theories are theories that are capable of being tested by experiment or observation. Our theories can never be proven correct, although a single counter-instance can prove them wrong.

One can sum up Popper's famous demarcation between science and non-science by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability. Accordingly, theories that are not falsifiable in principle cannot claim to be scientific, and so belong to metaphysics, ideology, or pseudo-science.

Popper's criterion of testability provides a clear, logical way of separating science from ideology and philosophy. Hence, string theory is not science but philosophy, as it currently makes no predictions capable of being tested. Popper argued that Marxism started out as a scientific theory: it predicted that capitalism would lead to increasing misery among the masses, and then be overthrown by revolution and replaced by socialism; it also predicted that this would occur first in the most technically developed countries. When the so-called worker's revolution first occurred in then-backward and agrarian Russia, supporters of the theory did not accept this as a refutation: the theory was simply modified so that it became immune to falsification. In other words, Marxism was transformed into an ideology.

The universal property of scientific theories cannot be stressed enough. A scientific theory cannot be merely speculation about a particular fact or an isolated event, because nothing new and non-trivial can be predicted from such a speculation. This point has to be stressed, because it has caused a great deal of confusion among philosophers and historians of science. For example, Shermer writes in the book:

"Popper's attempt to solve the problem of demarcation ... between science and nonscience begins to break down in the borderlands of knowledge. Consider the theory that extraterrestrial intelligent life exists somewhere in the cosmos. If we find out by making radio contact through the SETI program then the theory will have been proven absolutely ... But how could this theory ever be falsified?"

Shermer's mistake is his categorization of the statement `extraterrestrial intelligent life exists somewhere in the cosmos' as a scientific theory. It is no such thing. It is merely speculation about a specific fact, from which no non-trivial predictions follow. (For instance, it does not follow from this that such life would want to contact us, would share our values, would be friendly toward us, and so forth.) It is no more a scientific theory than the statement `there are white swans somewhere on the lake.' Such statements about specific factual matters can indeed be confirmed, even proven `beyond all reasonable doubt.' But this is only because they are not universal statements. Scientific theories are universal statements about how facts fit together, and from such universal statements follow predictions about specific facts. So, from the universal statement `all swans are white' follows the prediction that `the next swans we will see on the lake will be white.' The former is a (simple) scientific theory; the latter a prediction about a specific fact that follows from the theory, and that may used to test the theory.

Note that Shermer would have formulated his idea as a scientific theory if he had stated it in a universal, testable form, such as: "life arises quickly wherever there is water and an average temperature above freezing, and given a few billion years, some of this life will become recognizably intelligent." This is a universal statement that relates specific facts to each other, can be used to make predictions about how much intelligent life exists elsewhere in our galaxy, and can be tested (at least in principle) by sending probes to planets in which conditions for life appear to have been appropriate for a few billion years. If intelligent life is not found, then the theory is refuted, and must either be abandoned or modified.

It is precisely at the "borderlands of science" that Popper's criterion works so well. Parapsychology for instance, most certainly is a science to the extent that it makes predictions capable of being tested. But Shermer gives little attention to this field, as it conflicts with his ideology of materialism.

Shermer is not a scientist, but an historian. And as an historian he has no excuse for being woefully ignorant of the history of science. At one time reports that rocks sometimes fall from the sky (what we know call meteorites) were dismissed by most scientists as superstitious fantasies. The idea that the continents could drift was ridiculed for decades. Even X-rays were considered an elaborate hoax. Those who ignore the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them, and Shermer has simply not learned that popularity of ideas cannot be used as a guide to separate science from nonsense.

But Shermer is an intellectual lightweight who is simply out of his league when discussing the philosophy of science. If you want to read something really magnificent on the subject, I recommend "Replies to my Critics", in The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Part II, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp.

An excellent treaty on critical thinking.......2005-05-20

This is the second book on critical thinking I read by this author. The other was "Why People Believe Weird Things." They are both excellent. Michael Shermer is quite a polymath and original thinker. Armed with a Ph.D. in History of Science and an M.S. in Experimental Psychology, Shermer has acquired an outstanding understanding of the scientific method.

He is an excellent writer who has developed a lively style. He turns dry material (the integrity of science) into very entertaining books. You will note that my review jumps around quite a bit. That's because the book does too. It does not always follow a sequential pattern. However, it makes the book more fun to read.

At the beginning of the book, the author provides you with very good critical thinking tools, including 10 different steps to test a claim, and how to spot a crank. He also provides his assessment of the scientific credibility of various theories by assigning "fuzzy fractions." A 0.9 denotes a theory that is totally credible and well supported by science. A 0.1 denotes just the opposite. On such grounds, I like his distinction between SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) where he assigns it a respectable 0.5 and UFO where he assigns it a disrespectable 0.1. Thus, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence may have scientific merit. Meanwhile, testimonials of alien abductions have none.

Near the end of the book, Shermer comes back to providing more thinking tools as he shares six key steps on how to develop one's creative genius in the chapter: The Amadeus Myth. This is a fascinating chapter where he uncovers that what we interpret as gifted genius is incredibly hard work. We just observe the end product: virtuosity. But, this masks the incredibly hard life long work these individuals had undertaken whether they were Mozart or Einstein.

Over several chapters he covers the interesting research from Sulloway who conducted psychological analysis of what makes a likely scientific innovator. Through his work, the author studies in detail the profile of Carl Sagan, Stephen Jay Gould, and other scientists. Such luminaries typically have a very high openness to new ideas combined with an equally high level of skepticism. And, it is this combination that makes them unique. How many people do you know are open to new radical concepts, yet have the critical thinking quotient of testing such wild claims. That's the type of mind that can differentiate between SETI and UFOs without being either embarrassed or gullible.

The author also provides an excellent synthesis on the subject of ecocide. In just a few pages, he summarizes very efficiently what Jared Diamond took over 500 pages to investigate in his most recent book "Collapse." Shermer describes how several regional primitive civilizations exploited their natural resources to the detriment of their own survival. These included the Incas of Machu Picchu and the Polynesians of Easter Island among others. He then asks the chilling question of what will we do? Will we prevent further environmental deterioration? Or, will we commit ecocide too? All along he promotes policies based on the best scientific evidence supported by data absent of any political bias.

Throughout the book, there is an underlying admiration of Darwin. He is the benchmark of scientific integrity, and scientific timelessness. He was with few peers in his capability of fighting the status quo, questioning his theories until he had anticipated every rational rebuttal the scientific community could throw at him. In one chapter, he contrasts Darwin with Freud. Darwin was concerned primarily with the scientific basis of his theories. He never stopped refining them, researching them deeper to make sure of their validity. As a result, Darwin's posterity is second to none. Instead, Freud got more concerned about fame and posterity than the soundness of his theories. As a result, posterity was not kind to Freud. As a sign of things to come within the book, early on Shermer had assigned a fuzzy fraction of 0.9 to Darwin's theory of evolution. Meanwhile, he assigned only a 0.1 to Freudian psychoanalytic theory. In other words, Darwin's theory fully withstood the test of time, while Freud did not.

Shermer Ruins the Book by Talking Too Much.......2004-06-19

I expected more of Mr. Shermer in this outing, given his excellent work in Why People Believe Weird Things. But then, in that book, Shermer took on and successfully skewered the easy targets, such as UFO nuts, believers in astrology and other New Age fantasies, revisionist Holocaust deniers and whatnot. However, his latest effort basically amounts to little more than a barely intelligible rant than thoughtful scholarship. Shermer begins with a bold objective- trying to lay down demarcation lines between generally accepted science (as is generally accepted by scientists themselves), iffy propositions which he calls borderlands science, and a large group of topics that he labels non-science and pseudo science. I must say without hesitation that he fails miserably in his objective, partly due to his poor choice of content, but mostly because of his even poorer writing style.

Although the book starts out well, the writing steadily devolves, and by the fifth chapter, the reader must set his or her shoulders and hunker down for some very painful reading. Like most PhD holders, Shermer has acquired an impressive amount of scholarly trivia over the course of his education, yet somehow did not the master the mechanics of good writing. This actually is not hard to believe, as too many people finishing PhD programs in engineering, science and to the dishonor of all liberal arts traditions, English and history programs can not string together a few decent words of prose. Honestly, many of these programs think that they can make up for a lack of erudite soul with an overdose of abstract quantitation and esoteric facts.

And boy oh boy does this approach show in Mr. Shermer's stilted and constipated text. Moreover, as someone who regards himself as a champion of the hypothesis test and the scientific method, he really should know when to appropriately use such methods, and when not to use them. In reading his text, I got the feeling that in his graduate training he only attended the lectures in his Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences having to do with hypothesis testing, and studiously skipped all the other lectures, particularly those having to do with measurement, validity, operational definition and level of trust in results.

I say this because in his chapter on Psuedoscience and Race, he utterly fails to lay down an operational definition, and merely assumes that everyone shares the same common definition of race and knows what he is referring to. He also fails to consider the history of race and the common knowledge that race is a social construct, not a biological phenomenon. Though he provides a context (U.S. race relations), he does not provide an operational definition. He also seems unaware of considerable population genetic and molecular genetic evidence which would make it impossible for most in America to claim, at least from a genetic standpoint, to be truly 'white' or truly 'black'. Thus, from this one would have to assume, especially when reading Mr. Shermer's screed, that he defines race based on physical appearance pretty much like everybody else. However, scientists would take a different point of view, much as many a bigotted proponent of eugenics have on many occasions.

A second bone of contention that I have with Mr. Shermer's overly scientific and inappropriately quantitative approach to everything is his use in Part II Borderlands People, of quantitative methods to evaluate purely subjective things. Some variables we measure are concrete and have meaning that is fixed, such as weight, temperature and volume, athough we can use metric or English units to evaluate them. However, as I recall from one statistics text (the actual text is Richard M. Jaeger's Statistics A Spectator Sport), things like intelligence or neuroticism are totally subjective because their meaning and their measurement can change depending on who is evaluating and measuring them. For such things, there can be no common agreement as to definition or even measurement.

Which I believe Shermer should have learned, thus invalidating the invocation of Sulloway's work in his exposition. A good educational regimen in statistics (which I believe should begin with Moore's Statistics: Concepts and Controversies) would emphasize the importance of looking behind the numbers, using the appropriate measurement methods, and taking into account information other than that in the test when drawing conclusions. None of this was done within this text.

Still, I did learn a few things, being quite surprised to learn that there was actually a black champion cyclist, and Mr. Shermer did make a number of correct points. I also give him credit for (grudgingly) admitting, in his last chapter, that scientists are people too, and are motivated by the same concerns and issues like everyone else. Yet, this does not make up for the overall bad writing and worse scholarship. I expect, no, I insist on better from a self-respecting skeptic.

An Excellent Primer on Critical Thinking.......2004-01-10

Michael Shermer gives an open and honest account about the inner workings of scientific thought as well as exposing ideas that-even today-many take as fact. The above reviews criticize Shermer for presenting science as philosophy, but there is no question that science is a belief system-it is influenced by culture and opinion. It does not exist as some purely isolated set of truths, partitioned from reality. This is Shermer's point about many scientific ideas throughout the book, not a blunder or misstep. Yes, science uses a particular method to understand the world. But Shermer points out that there are culturally driven forces behind the things we chose to study. Anyone versed in scientific method understands this. Throughout the book, Shermer stresses the criteria for labeling something "science".
Using a textbook definition of science will get you nowhere if your intent is to understand how science truly works. If you want to find the true meaning of life, for instance, rarely would you use Webster's to find it.
This is a great book for anyone truly interested in science and scientific thought. Shermer uses interesting stories, facts and ideas to relay his message that science may not always be as cut and dry as we may think, but its the best method we have of interpreting the world around us.

Very well arranged.......2004-01-09

The Borderlands of Science, like all good science books includes philosophy. When you are writing about the importance and big picture of science, writing about philosophy is inevitable and very much necessary to show the meaning. Because Shermer has so much experience in cricism it is only right that he debunk nonsciences such as remote viewing. I will be anxious for new literature.

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense.: An article from: Journal of Medical Speech - Language Pathology

Average customer rating:

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense.: An article from: Journal of Medical Speech - Language Pathology
Scott R. Youmans
Manufacturer: Delmar Learning
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital
ASIN: B0008IRJIA
Release Date: 2005-07-31

Book Description

This digital document is an article from Journal of Medical Speech - Language Pathology, published by Delmar Learning on December 1, 2003. The length of the article is 1355 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense.
Author: Scott R. Youmans
Publication: Journal of Medical Speech - Language Pathology (Refereed)
Date: December 1, 2003
Publisher: Delmar Learning
Volume: 11 Issue: 4 Page: 241(2)

Distributed by Thomson Gale

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense

Average customer rating:

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense
Michael Shermer
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OK9OH6

Average customer rating:

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense
Michael Shermer
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000OKPSJY

Book Description

This volume contains 53 of the papers presented at the Conference on Tropical Rainforest Research - Current Issues, which was held in Brunei Darussalam in April 1993. The book provides an overview of current knowledge, particularly with respect to south-east Asia, and is divided into three sections - Biodiversity, Forest Dynamics and Socioeconomics. The Biodiversity section emphasises the vast range of life forms in tropical forests and considers the theory and practice of estimating species richness and spatial distribution, while contributions on Forest Dynamics provide a better understanding of the maintenance of this species richness. With an improved background of ideas on rainforest dynamics and biodiversity, better management and conservation strategies are possible, and some of these are explored in the papers on Socioeconomics. The need to demonstrate the total worth of tropical forests to ensure their conservation is taken up by a number of contributors.

Books:

Books Index

Books Home

Recommended Books