Average customer rating:
- Very sound guide and advice for upper GI problems
- Good Guide to Upper GI Health
|
Indigestion: LIVING BETTER WITH UPPER INTESTINAL PROBLEMS FORM HEARTBURN TO ULCERS TO GALLSTONES
HENRY JANOWITZ
Manufacturer: Oxford University Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
General
| World
| History
| Subjects
| Books
General
| France
| Europe
| History
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Medicine
| Subjects
| Books
Gastroenterology
| Internal Medicine
| Medicine
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Parenting & Families
| Subjects
| Books
Gastroenterology
| Internal Medicine
| Medicine
| Medical
| Professional & Technical
| Subjects
| Books
Ulcers & Gastritis
| Disorders & Diseases
| Health, Mind & Body
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Disorders & Diseases
| Health, Mind & Body
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Health, Mind & Body
| Subjects
| Books
Accessories:
-
Braun IRT 4020 ThermoScan Ear Thermometer
ASIN: 019508554X |
Book Description
In clear language, free of medical jargon, with healthy doses of humor and many easy-to-understand examples, Dr. Henry D. Janowitz provides you with everything you need to know about indigestion, offering sound advice on how to avoid problems and soothing the fears of those in distress. He shows you how to prepare for a visit to the doctor--what the physician needs to know, what tests you might undergo, and what the latest diagnostic techniques are (including MRI and endoscopy). Dr. Janowitz then zeroes in on specific problems of the esophagus, stomach, gall bladder, liver, and pancreas. He outlines the causes of peptic ulcers and discusses the best methods of prevention and treatment, shows how to distinguish between chest pain originating in the esophagus and the anginal pain of heart disease, and surveys such problems as gallstones, pancreatic disorders, jaundice, malabsorption, maldigestion, and food allergies. He also examines the effects of aging on the upper digestive tract and, in a final chapter, illuminates the role of stress in functional indigestion. A reliable guide to extremely common medical complaints, Indigestion is must reading for anyone suffering from heartburn, ulcers, gall bladder disease, or any number of common gastrointestinal ailments.
Customer Reviews:
Very sound guide and advice for upper GI problems.......1999-06-11
In clear, jargon-free language, with healthy doses of humor and many easy-to-understand examples, the author of Your Gut Feelings and Good Foods for Bad Stomachs, Dr. Janowitz offers everything you need to know about indigestion, providing sound advice on how to avoid problems and soothing the fears of those in distress. I found this book very helpful and will be for anyone suffering from any number of gastrointestinal ailments, from Crohn's to constipation to ulcers to GERD. A very good overall guide to upper intestinal health.
Good Guide to Upper GI Health.......1997-07-04
In clear, jargon-free language, with healthy doses of humor and many easy-to-understand examples, the author of Your Gut Feelings and Good Foods for Bad Stomachs, Dr. Janowitz offers everything you need to know about indigestion, providing sound advice on how to avoid problems and soothing the fears of those in distress. I found this book very helpful and will be for anyone suffering from any number of gastrointestinal ailments, from Crohn's to constipation to ulcers to GERD. A very good overall guide to upper intestinal health
Book Description
There is, in a post-Cold War climate, a great need for an active, engaged U.S. foreign policy. Isolationism is not a viable solution. Yet given the limits of American power and wisdom, an engaged policy has to be conducted in a multilateral framework, informed by criticisms as well as agreement from other countries, and carried out with their active cooperation in multilateral institutions. Published at the height of the Vietnam War, No Clear and Present Danger argues that if the Vietnam War derived in substantial part from an overconfident and unilateral interpretation of history, that is a mistake from which we can still learn.
Customer Reviews:
Maybe Andrew Bacevich should have read this book.......2006-08-29
Yale University Political Scientist Bruce Russett's thesis can be summarised with the following quote from his book.
"American participation in World War II had very little effect on the essential structure of international politics thereafter, and probablt did little either to advance the material welfare of most Americans or to make the nation secure from foreign military threats (the presumed goals of advocates of a "realist" foreign policy). (By structure I mean the basic balance of forces in the world, regardless of which particular nations are powerful vis-a-vis the United States.) In fact, most Americans probably would have been no worse off, and probably a little better, if the United States had never become a belligerent. Russia replaced Germany as the great threat to European security, and Japan, despite it's territorial losses, is once more a great power."
It's natural when paradigms are failing for investigators to return to their origins and seek out the views of their critics. Ronald Radosh did this when he was a member of the New Left and America's then quagmire was in rice paddies not quick sand. Radosh interrogated the writings of five isolationist critics of America's path to WWII and the Cold War. Other investigators sift through the fine detail, revisit the archives and engage in revisionist history. With the new quagmire we are seeing this deju vu all over again.
But Russett eschews both those paths. He neither unburies forgotten prophets or trawls for lost telegrams, instead he turns the fine focus to blurr and looks for the big picture. In his final chapters we get a taste of his 'macroscopic" methodology. Russett's macroscope sees Japan as being pushed into war, not so much by any Rooseveltian chicanery or home grown militaristic mania, but by the disappearance of options making either withdrawl from China or negotiation with the Anglo-Americans impossible. The Pearl Harbor attack was in a sense a desperate gamble by a power with a GDP perhaps a tenth of America's. In Europe Russett saw a stalemate emerging as Hitler fails to defeat the RAF and the war with Stalin erupts.
Russett warns us that the usual portraits of Nazi evil are true but as the true depths of their depravity were not really appreciated until after WWII so these arguments are not available for retrospective justification. This is not a rule Russett applies consistently. He relies on much data gathered post WWII that shows that Axis war preparations and production capabilities were consistently exaggerated by Allied leaders.
Russett argues the hypothetical case for a middle path between isolationism and interventionism, essentially it's the path of 'limited war', a phrase that only became common in the cold war era. Russett correctly points out that in fact the division between "isolationists" and "interventionists" was more of a shifting and over-lapping spectrum, rival strategies rather than a Berlin Wall ideological split. Many "isolationists" urged America to be armed to the teeth and FDR's pre-Pearl Harbor strategy of "all aid short of war" had numerous "isolationist" supporters, not all of whom were pacifists or even neutralists. There were interventionists in FDR's administration, but it is, at least, possible that their number did not include FDR himself until virtually the dawn of Pearl Harbor. Russett believes a continuation of the "all aid short of war" strategy pioneered in Lend Lease, convoy protection etc would have been sufficient to keep Britain afloat as a viable western counter to any German european hegemony. Such an 'isolationist' strategy would also be 'realist', providing America with a potential base and ally as an insurance policy in the unlikely event that the new Nazi empire, would grow into a true global power with trans-Atlantic reach.
The actual "All aid short of war" phase of FDR's actual strategy was as Russett informs us itself really the first, if unheralded, chapter of American 'limited war'. Russett takes FDR to task, as do most of the revisionists, for the secrecy that cloaked this limited war. These were the first steps to the Imperial Presidency. Russett's defence of this limited war is of course somewhat ironic, considering his status as a critic of the Vietnam adventure.
Russett's book is in a sense the book Andrew Bacevich should read .Bacevich is a modern critic of "The New American Militarism" and America's latest quicksand quagmire. Bacevich's analysis has it's roots in the work of revisionist historian and liberal isolationist Charles Beard. Yet Bacevich has argued that modern opponents of the new militarism are wasting their breath by taking a revisionist line on WWII and questioning FDR. Maybe he was thinking too much about Beard, perhaps Russett's approach would give Bacevich the middle path he was after.
In any event this compact, well written volume of a mere 108 pages punches above it's weight. For my money the chapters dealing wit the Pacific War were excellent as was his overview of the European theatre pre-Pearl Harbour. The later chapters exploring his analytical methodology are interesting and provide a strong empirical case for focusing on national fundamentals (ie GDP, demography, cultural traditions) rather than the latest scare headlines from some corner of the globe, an approach that guarantees a constant chase of phantoms. These chapters are not as well written as the earlier ones which is a pity, as they suggest a realist alternative to nostrums of which the neocons are merely the latest peddlars.
Accurate in the local sense, inaccurate in the global.......2001-07-14
There are few more controversial premises for a book than the one that motivated the writing of this one. The author argues that the United States was under no severe threat from either Germany or Japan in the period of the late 1930's until the attack at Pearl Harbor. His first premise is that Germany had not been able to subdue Britain and was stalemated on the Soviet front in 1941, which would have eventually led to some form of negotiated truce. Germany then and in the near future would have possessed no capability to directly attack the United States. Japan was also bogged down in China and overextended in other areas, such as Southeast Asia. While an initial attack would be damaging, there was little chance that Japan could defeat the U.S. With these "facts" as a basis, Russett argues that Roosevelt's tactics of engaging in a naval shooting war with Germany in the Atlantic and embargoing goods essential to Japan, unnecessarily goaded them into a war that could have been avoided. He considers the goading unnecessary because neither nation presented any clear and present danger to the United States.
This is a case where the author is correct in the technical sense but wrong in the practical, and the degree to which he is correct is dependent on your definition of the phrase, `clear and present danger." It is true that neither nation had the capability to do significant material damage to the territory of the United States. However, the invasion and/or wholesale killing of a nation's citizens is not the only danger that can exist.
Russett has the benefit of hindsight in knowing a great deal about the resources that Germany possessed in the period where Roosevelt was inching the nation toward war. At that time, Germany was still a very real threat to invade and conquer the British Isles, an event far more serious than the fall of the rest of Europe. No one in America at that time knew that Germany simply could not launch an invasion. One point he used as justification was that it took the US and Britain many years to complete the build up so that the cross channel invasion could be launched. While true it also misses the point. When the allies carried out the D-Day invasion, it was against a well-equipped enemy with years to prepare set defenses. After Dunkirk, there were many soldiers in Britain but they had almost no equipment or set defenses. Had the Germans been able to establish a solid beachhead, there really was very little to stop them.
Russett also seems to ignore the long-term dangers. If Japan had been able to execute their real plan, which was to control the resources of Indochina and the Dutch West Indies, the long-term consequences to the U.S. would have been severe. Japan would have controlled a strategic set of resources that would have made them a superpower, and given their militaristic nature at that time, a continuing threat to expand. The fall of the Phillipines into that set would have also been inevitable as they simply could not have been defended.
The same neglect also applies to the threat of Germany. Even if you ignore the appalling nature of the regime, a Europe controlled by Germany from Gibralter to the Soviet border would have been the most powerful "nation" in the world. At the time of Roosevelt's moves no one understood the power of resistance movements and he could only see a powerful empire that would be expansionist and ideologically incompatible with the United States. One only has to look at how the Soviet Union ruthlessly exploited the nations of Eastern Europe after the war to understand how valuable an asset they were.
Finally, Russett argues that the global power of the United States was not significantly altered by participation in the war. Which is nonsense. Before the war, Britain was the only global superpower and after it ended, the United States filled that role. Granted, it thrust the U.S. into situations where military force was inappropriately applied, but that is different in that is the application of power rather than the existence.
The premise of this book is one that must be presented for the sake of historical completeness. While true if you suffer from a lack of extended thought, it simply does not hold up if you consider the situation as it appeared to Roosevelt in 1940 when he faced two mighty empires allied with each other.
Good revisionist account of pre-ww2 events.......1999-03-20
This is a very moderate book in regard to conjectures made by the author; Russett is not even an isolationist. He still points out very compelling reasons why US entry was forced by bad choices made by American leaders.
Average customer rating:
|
NO CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER: A Skeptical View of the United States Entry into World War II.(Review): An article from: The Australian Journal of Politics and History
Joseph M. Siracusa
Manufacturer: University of Queensland Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Digital
General
| United States
| Americas
| History
| Subjects
| Books
Australia
| Australia & Oceania
| History
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Politics
| Nonfiction
| Subjects
| Books
Political Science
| Nonfiction
| Subjects
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
General
| History
| Subjects
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
United States
| History
| Subjects
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
General
| History
| HTML
| Formats
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
United States
| History
| HTML
| Formats
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
General
| Nonfiction
| HTML
| Formats
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
Political Science
| Nonfiction
| HTML
| Formats
| e-Docs
| Formats
| Books
ASIN: B00098O5IQ
Release Date: 2005-07-28 |
Book Description
This digital document is an article from The Australian Journal of Politics and History, published by University of Queensland Press on March 1, 1999. The length of the article is 580 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: NO CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER: A Skeptical View of the United States Entry into World War II.(Review)
Author: Joseph M. Siracusa
Publication:
The Australian Journal of Politics and History (Refereed)
Date: March 1, 1999
Publisher: University of Queensland Press
Volume: 45
Issue: 1
Page: 139(1)
Article Type: Book Review
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Book Description
This monumental and fascinating book, the product of seven years of original research, will forever change the terms of the debate about the conflicting claims of the Arabs and the Jews in the Middle East.
The weight of the comprehensive evidence found and brilliantly analyzed by historian and journalist Joan Peters answers many crucial questions, among them: Why are the Arab refugees from Israel seen in a different light from all the other, far more numerous peoples who were displaced after World War II? Why, indeed, are they seen differently from the Jewish refugees who were forced, in 1948 and after, to leave the Arab countries to find a haven in Israel? Who, in fact, are the Arabs who were living within the borders of present-day Israel, and where did they come from?
Joan Peters's highly readable and moving development of the answers to these and related questions will appear startling, even to those on both sides of the argument who have considered themselves to be in command of the facts. On the basis of a definitive weight of hitherto unexamined population and other historical data, much of it buried in untouched archives, Peters demonstrates that Jews did not displace Arabs in Palestine-just the reverse: Arabs displaced Jews; that a hidden but major Arab migration and immigration took place into areas settled by Jews in pre-Israel Palestine; that a substantial number of the Arab refugees called Palestinians in reality had foreign roots; that for every Arab refugee who left Israel in 1948, there was a Jewish refugee who fled or was expelled from his Arab birthplace at the same time-today's much discussed Sephardic majority in Israel is in fact composed mainly of these Arab-born Jewish refugees or their offspring; that Britain, the Mandatory power, winked at and even encouraged Arab immigration into Palestine between the two World Wars; that by disguising the Arab immigrants as "indigenous native Palestinian Arabs," the British justified their restrictions on Jewish immigration and settlement, dooming masses of European Jews to destruction in the Nazi camps.
Joan Peters also unfolds a historical record to shatter the widely held belief that Arabs and Jews harmoniously coexisted for centuries in the Arab world-the fact is that the Jews, along with other non-Muslims, were second-class citizens, oppressed in the Muslim world for more than a millennium. And this continuing prejudicial tradition of hostility underlies, as well, every Arab action toward the state of Israel.
In addition to her pioneering archival researches, Joan Peters has frequently traveled in the Middle East, conducting numerous interviews and gathering the personal observations of the first-rate reporter she is. The result is a book that has already had a major impact on policy discussions of one of the most vital and intractable of the world's problems, shrouded until now in a fog of misinformation and ignorance.
Distributed exclusively by Jonathan David Publishers.
Customer Reviews:
The Following Fantasy words may be harmful to your psychological health .......2007-10-15
West Bank, Gaza strip, Palestinians, Both sides, Apartheid wall, palestinian culture, palestinian food. palestinian language, palestinian dress..........These and many more catchphrases and buzzwords are the language of jew hatred.
From Time immemorial is not only a fact based exposition on the actual population makeup of the holy land but also reveals the many myriads of ways that the reinhabiting of modern israel by the inheritors of the land has been attempted to be destroyed by the myriads of enemies of the chosen people. The turks, the british, the united nations, the WASP establishment in the US, and of coruse the barbaric thieving arabs.
Brilliantly researched and footnoted.......2007-09-30
If this is a work of fiction it is the most profusely researched and superbly footnoted work of fiction in existence. The copious footnotes are all one needs to refer to in order to dispel the ad-hominem attacks and typical accusations of 'Zionist propaganda' that appear in the reviews of the apologists for Arab propaganda.
When the Arabs could not defeat Israel militarily they took the next most effective course - to engage in the most Orwellian 'turnspeak' in order to turn history on its head.
Ultimately, this tiny notch of land is not the problem for the 'Palestinians'. It is 60 years of self-imposed refugeeship which exists for no reason other than to be a propaganda weapon against Israel. A glance at a map puts the whole thing in stark perspective. A tiny country surrounded by countries which, openly or tacitly, see the destruction of Israel as a holy duty.
This book should be required reading in schools and parliaments across the globe.
"Mrs. Peters' Palestine".......2007-09-30
Joan Peters' work is a well-known hoax and yet it continues to enjoy best selling status at amazon. The book is a complete work of fiction- 600+ pages of hogwash replete with Zionist propaganda. Either the reviewers are simply ignorant or engaged in a deceptive project no different than the author (the latter seems more likely).
A little research on this book would surely reveal Peters' fabrications:
Reviewing the book for the January 16, 1986 issue of The New York Review of Books, Yehoshua Porath wrote that Peters made "highly tendentious use -- or neglect -- of the available source material". But more crucial, he wrote, "is her misunderstanding of basic historical processes and her failure to appreciate the central importance of natural population increase as compared to migratory movements." Porath concluded:
"Readers of her book should be warned not to accept its factual claims without checking their sources. Judging by the interest that the book aroused and the prestige of some who have endorsed it, I thought it would present some new interpretation of the historical facts. I found none. Everyone familiar with the writing of the extreme nationalists of Zeev Jabotinsky's Revisionist party (the forerunner of the Herut party) would immediately recognize the tired and discredited arguments in Mrs. Peters's book. I had mistakenly thought them long forgotten. It is a pity that they have been given new life."
In 2002, the editor of Objectivist Magazine wrote: "I have focused on the critics' claims. From Time Immemorial is work of propaganda, with all the bad connotations that term carries. Peters'[s] case rests upon distortion and fabrication. Time and again, she misconstrues sources in a tendentious manner. She cribs uncritically from partisan works. She conceals crucial calculations, and draws hard conclusions from tenuous evidence. She speculates wildly and without ground. She exaggerates figures and selects numbers to suit her thesis. She adduces evidence that in no way supports her claims, sometimes even omitting `inconvenient' portions of the citation. She invents contradictions in sources she wishes to discredit by quoting them out of context. She `forgets' undesirable numbers in her calculations. She ignores sources that cast doubt on her conclusions, even when she herself uses those sources for other purposes. She makes baseless insinuations and misleading claims."
Time to Read this Book.......2007-09-20
Everyone should take the time to read this book. It may disqualify many of the myths and beliefs Westerner's have about the Middle East. Knowledge combats illogical prejudice, newscasters, and attempts to sway other's thinking.
Debunks Arab Propaganda.......2007-08-19
I thought I knew everything about the Arab propaganda machine. But, what a surprise. Here is a writer with the guts to tell it as it really happened, not as the bleeding hearts for "Palestinians" say it happened. Israel has made mistakes, as any country has, but the greatest mistake was not using Ms. Peters as its spokesperson.
Average customer rating:
|
Atlantic Alcidae
T. R. Birkhead
Manufacturer: Academic Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
General
| Birdwatching
| Outdoors & Nature
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 0125156715 |
Books:
- Intergenerational Relationships: Conversations On Practices And Research Across Cultures
- It's Not About the Bike: My Journey Back to Life
- Japanese Childrearing: Two Generations of Scholarship
- Keys to Parenting a Child with Attention Deficit Disorder (Barron's Parenting Keys)
- La Sanjuanera
- Let Go and Live in the Now: Awaken the Peace, Power, and Happiness in Your Heart
- Living Well: Taking Care of Yourself in the Middle and Later Years (Large Print Edition)
- Mao: The Unknown Story
- MILO in the Woods of Wonder
- Mothercare New Guide to Pregnancy and Child Care : An Illustrated Guide to Caring For Your Child from Preganancy Through Age Five
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- History: Fiction or Science
- Dragonart: How to Draw Fantastic Dragons and Fantasy Creatures
- Apremont
- Artists Sketchbook
- Colorful Introduction to the Anatomy of the Human Brain, A: A Brain and Psychology Coloring Book
- Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed
- Dear Senator: A Memoir by the Daughter of Strom Thurmond
- Sweetest Heart Mary Engelbreit
- Arte de respirar, El
- Nepenthes of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia