Book Description
In December 1862, things were still confused for the Union. Antietam had been a tactical failure for both sides, and although the battle showed that the Union army could bring the Confederates to bay, it couldn't pin them in one place long enough to destroy them. McClellan was slow in pursuing the withdrawing Lee, not acting until October 1862. Still, Lee's invasion had been stalled and repulsed. In the West General Grant was closing on Vicksburg, and the Mississippi was under greater Union control. Lincoln appointed General Burnside to command the Army of the Potomac, and it was the latter who planned to seize and secure the town of Fredericksburg, and then take the Confederate capital of Richmond. Carl Smith's book details the epic struggle that engulfed the Union side as it crossed the Rappahannock on December 11, encountering stiff opposition from Lee's men.
Customer Reviews:
Errors Abound.......2001-01-12
I hate to nit-pick, but I found Fredericksburg 1862 and Chancellorsville 1863 to be replete with errors, at least the versions I read, both Military Book Club editions. The lists of errors I sent to Osprey went on for a three and six pages respectively. Many of them were relatively minor, but there were enough of them, and some not so minor, to cause me to consider the books greatly flawed. Let me note here that I live near Fredericksburg and volunteer once a month at the Chancellorsville Battlefield Visitor Center, so I am fairly familiar with the battles in question. I also want to point out up front that Osprey was very receptive to my comments and implied that future editions may incorporate some changes. I own more than 75 Osprey titles and that this is certainly not the norm for their products, many of which are excellent.
Some types of problems I noted with the books included:
- spelling errors such as Sedgewick for Sedgwick (not always, but several times), Siegel for Sigel and Hero Van Borke for Heros von Borcke.
- geographic errors such as inaccurate descriptions of the road net, an incorrect locations for geographic features, and faulty relative positions.
- graphical errors such as inaccurate troop dispositions (multiple instances), incorrect unit symbology and faulty depiction of vegetation on maps.
- factual errors such as placing events on the wrong date, incorrectly identifying unit commanders and referring to Chancellorsville as a farmhouse rather than an inn.
I recommend waiting for a revised edition.
Useful but flawed.......2000-12-04
The diagrams and orders of battle are very good. Some of the diagrams, including that of the attack on the town, are invaluable. However, if using this as a serious reference, make sure you have a second source. There are a number of disturbing errors. A quote credited to Longstreet was actually by Alexander Porter. The dates on the Mud March are wrong (or perhaps this section is just poorly written). The name of one of the two generals who criticized Burnside in Washington is wrong! These errors throw into serious question the editing and validity of the work.
Typos on the Rappahannock.......2000-11-14
Smith's is one of the better Osprey volumes, with some evocative Hook 'paintings' (I hesitate to use the word "art")and nicely detailed maps of the fighting in and around the town and Marye's Heights. While the narrative is a bit choppy, in terms of style, it makes its point. The detailed OoB is quite valuable . . .and would be more so if it weren't for the disturbing number of typos (The 22nd Mass regiment with 2100+ men? A battery with 21 Napoleons.) Not definitive, nor is it intended to be, but valuable nonetheless.
A fine book for military historians with great art and maps.......1999-11-08
Carl Smith's latest book is useful for the military historian, the reenactor, the wargamer and the general public. The book provides a useful order of battle that allows one to determine what units participated in the battle. In a very readable manner, the book covers the famous charges by Union troops against Confederate positions on Marye's heights. More notable is the book's coverage of the savage street fighting that took place prior to these famous charges. The book has three splendid 3-dimension maps as well as a host of smaller ones. The book is also well illustrated by Adam Hook; Hook's best work perhaps being the picture of Sgt. Kirkland giving water to wounded federal soldiers. All in all, I heartily recommend this book.
Book Description
In this long-awaited sequel to his international bestseller The Holocaust Industry, Norman G. Finkelstein moves from an iconoclastic interrogation of the new anti-Semitism to a meticulously researched exposé of the corruption of scholarship on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Bringing to bear the latest findings on the conflict and recasting the scholarly debate, Finkelstein points to a consensus among historians and human rights organizations on the factual record. Why, then, does so much controversy swirl around the conflict? Finkelstein's answer, copiously documented, is that apologists for Israel contrive controversy. Whenever Israel comes under international pressure, another media campaign alleging a global outbreak of anti-Semitism is mounted.
Finkelstein also scrutinizes the proliferation of distortion masquerading as history. Recalling Joan Peters' book From Time Immemorial, published to great fanfare in 1984 but subsequently exposed as an academic hoax, he asks deeply troubling questions here about the periodic reappearance of spurious scholarship and the uncritical acclaim it receives. The most recent addition to this genre, Finkelstein argues, is Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz's bestseller, The Case for Israel.
The core analysis of Beyond Chutzpah sets Dershowitz's assertions on Israel's human rights record against the findings of the mainstream human rights community. Sifting through thousands of pages of reports from organizations such as Amnesty International, B'Tselem, and Human Rights Watch, Finkelstein argues that Dershowitz has misrepresented the facts.
Thoroughly researched and tightly argued, Beyond Chutzpah lifts the veil of controversy shrouding the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Download Description
In this long-awaited sequel to his international bestseller The Holocaust Industry, Norman G. Finkelstein moves from an iconoclastic interrogation of the new anti-Semitism to a meticulously researched exposé of the corruption of scholarship on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Bringing to bear the latest findings on the conflict and recasting the scholarly debate, Finkelstein points to a consensus among historians and human rights organizations on the factual record. Why, then, does so much controversy swirl around the conflict? Finkelstein's answer, copiously documented, is that apologists for Israel contrive controversy. Whenever Israel comes under international pressure, another media campaign alleging a global outbreak of anti-Semitism is mounted. Finkelstein also scrutinizes the proliferation of distortion masquerading as history. Recalling Joan Peters' book From Time Immemorial, published to great fanfare in 1984 but subsequently exposed as an academic hoax, he asks deeply troubling questions here about the periodic reappearance of spurious scholarship and the uncritical acclaim it receives. The most recent addition to this genre, Finkelstein argues, is Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz's bestseller, The Case for Israel. The core analysis of Beyond Chutzpah sets Dershowitz's assertions on Israel's human rights record against the findings of the mainstream human rights community. Sifting through thousands of pages of reports from organizations such as Amnesty International, B'Tselem, and Human Rights Watch, Finkelstein argues that Dershowitz has misrepresented the facts. Thoroughly researched and tightly argued, Beyond Chutzpah lifts the veil of controversy shrouding the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Customer Reviews:
Jewish soul-searching and anti-Semitism........2007-10-11
As one can see from the enthusiastic celebrations around this book, it is indeed a long waited for delicacy for all those who are uneasy with the idea that the Jewish People are also entitled to their national sovereignty in their ancient-new homeland. These celebrating people do not like to consider themselves anti-Semites (today it is not considered bon-ton), and are deeply offended when somebody dares to suggest that they are, but nevertheless they are convinced that the rebuilding of the Jewish State in our times is an intolerable outrage. They are passionately trying to prove that the Jewish State is illegitimate, or at least its struggle to defend itself from its sworn deadly enemies is.
And now here comes this Jewish Guru who in his new book "scholarly and methodically" analyses and proves how right they are and gives them his stamp of approval, his certificate of Kosherness. They couldn't have asked for more, "the right thing at the right time" and hence this enthusiastic welcome.
Nevertheless, I would like to remind everybody a well known idiosyncrasy of the Jewish people, which may help to bring this whole issue in the right perspective. The Jews have a singular tendency to soul-searching which characterizes them since ancient times (remember the Prophets?). We have a strong tendency to demanding from ourselves uncompromising high standards of conduct which we are not always succeeding to live up to, and this leads to very harsh and very frequently unfair self-criticism. You can find it in articles written by Jewish reporters in Israeli newspapers as well as abroad. You can find it also in books like the subject one. Sometimes this self-criticism becomes unreasonably harsh and unfair, bordering with insanity, and sometimes it is outright insane. Even though the motives are diametrically opposite, this insanity is very similar to another soul pathology called anti-Semitism.
In a way, this insane level of the characteristic Jewish soul-searching and the anti-Semitic pathology are related, and feeding each other. On one side the anti-Semite is more than happy to concur with the Jewish self criticism, especially when it is sufficiently insane. On the other side, the insane Jewish leftist is convinced that as soon as we become angels, the anti-Semites will suddenly realize how nice people we are, and will instantly fall in love with the Jews.
This is in a nutshell my explanation to this biased, tendentious, one-sided and unfair anti-Semitic hate-pamphlet written by a deranged self-hating Jewish intellectual, and the enthusiastic way it is welcome by anti-Semites worldwide, Jewish and non-Jewish.
an attempt at analysis.......2007-09-19
this is an attempt at honest analysis of this issue.
however,the various author are so angry at each other that often are more
attent at respond to each other and the objectivity suffers.
this does not mean to imply that this particular book is misleading. it tries very hard to be impartial and it almost often succeeds
a must read.......2007-09-10
This is a must read, specially for those who support Israel and Zionism. Norman Finkelstein raises questions that we should all contemplate. Regardless of your political views, you can only gain from this book. Sadly, Prof. Finkelstein has already paid the price for his views.
Finkelstein vs. Chomsky.......2007-07-16
This reads like a thesis. Almost every paragraph starts with why Chomsky, another professor at a prestigious university, is wrong.
I couldn't stand it.
Some authors write books on history. Others re-write history in books. .......2007-06-21
Falsities, distortions, omissions, insults and biasness are things you'll find in this book. Objectivity, balance and honesty are things you won't find in Beyond Chutzpah, a book on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
For example, in regards to the Palestinian refugee problem, the author states that "The scholarly consensus is that Palestinians were ethnically cleansed in 1948." Yet there is no truth to this statement since various historians have reached various conclusions. The author also attempts to prove that there was no such thing as Arab radio broadcasts urging Palestinians to leave their homes prior to or during the 1948 war, summarizing it as a Zionist lie. However, there is other evidence, which shows that Arab authorities - through means other than radio broadcasts - urged Palestinians to leave their homes, which the author neglects to mention.
Another example of dishonesty is when the author refers to the Palestinian people as "indigenous", when in fact they originated from the Arabian Peninsula and other parts outside of Israel/Palestine. That's like claiming that Spaniards are the indigenous people of Mexico! Equally absurd is the author's fanciful and historically inaccurate comparison of Palestinians to American Indians, whose territories were conquered and colonized by Europeans, and the European conquerors, he compares to Zionists. This comparison is completely nonsensical, considering the fact that Jews have lived in Israel/Palestine for some 2,000 years before Arabs even settled there! In fact, the name "Palestine" was given by the Romans who ruled the region during the second century (five centuries before Arabs begin settling there) in order to wipe off the region's Jewish identity. Thus, the author has it all wrong: The Jews are the indigenous people of Israel/Palestine, not the Arabs. Sure enough, the author mentions the Arab population in Palestine before 1948, but entirely dismisses the Jewish population, as though Jews simply did not exist there, or as he puts it; "two millennia of non-Jewish settlement in Palestine." Now how could one publish such explicit lies and get away with it? These are not facts, but mere fabrications.
History shows us that the Jews have lived in Palestine longer than any other people, for some 3,500 consecutive years. Granted, the Jewish population greatly diminished to the point where Arabs outnumbered them, but at no time during the Zionist movement was Palestine ever an Arab nation. When the Zionist movement began in late 19th century, the Turkish Ottoman Empire ruled the region. After WW1, it was the British. Moreover, during those periods, Jerusalem's population was predominantly Jewish. But the author does not provide the reader with such information. His approach, instead, is to blame everything - literally everything - on Zionists and the State of Israel, even for "Sadam (Hussein) to embark on a nuclear weapons program"!
But these are not the only important facts the author omits. There are many others. Like the fact that in 1922, the British government gave some three quarters of Palestine to the Hashemite Kingdom to create an exclusively Arab state, or the fact that the 1948 war was initiated by six Arab nations. Nope. Instead, the author writes about how in 1948, under the 1947 UN Partition Plan, the Arabs were offered "only" half of Palestine, as though they should have been entitled to all of it and makes it sounds like Israel is the one who started the war.
Other examples of biasness, include the author's mentions of Israeli atrocities against Palestinians, such as the Deir Yassin massacre in 1948, yet completely ignoring Palestinians atrocities against Jews, like the 1929 massacre in Hebron, or the 1938 massacre in Tiberias, or the killings between 1936-1939, or the 1970 school bus massacre in Avivim, or the 1974 massacre in Maalot, etc, etc. In addition to all of this, you will find insults and ridicule, like when the author ponders rhetorically, "Shouldn't Chesler (author of The New Anti-Semitism...) first have consulted the idiot's guide to the Middle-East?" Very funny. And of course, none of this would be complete without a few anti-Semitic clichés like; "Zionist fabrication," "Zionist propaganda," and "Zionist fairy tale."
Speaking of anti-Semitism, the author persistently asserts that Jews are and have been misusing anti-Semitism as a political tool to gain advantages, and therefore, somehow instigating anti-Semitism themselves. Yet at the same time, the author manages to downplay the reality of the new anti-Semitism. Granted, it is true that Jews have used anti-Semitism as a political tool, there's no question about that. But if you understand the history anti-Semitism and put things in proper context, it only makes sense for Jews to use anti-Semitism as a political tool. Being a tiny minority in every country outside Israel and having suffered so much throughout history, it is, to a certain extant, a tool for self defense; to ensure that they are treated properly without prejudice or hostility so that history does not repeat itself. Just as it is proper for African Americans to use the "race card", as whites call it, as a political tool to ensure equality and fair treatment in society, it's proper for Jews to do the same, as long as they don't go overboard. And sure, some individual Jews and Jewish Organizations have gone overboard, but the author takes this whole idea entirely out of context and blows it completely out of proportion making one feel like they are reading excerpts from The Protocols of The Elders of Zion.
Another issue I have with this book is that the author's attempt to compel the reader into believing that anyone who criticizes Israel is automatically labeled an anti-Semite. That is not true. In fact, if that were the case, then the majority of Israelis would be anti-Semites, according to the author's own logic (or lack of). However, there is a visible difference between criticism and attacks, which the author fails to see. When someone slanders and insults Jewish people, why can't it be called by its real name; anti-Semitism? The author is simply trying to play a game of reverse psychology in hopes to silence Jews from defending themselves.
Other subjects in this book include Israel's human rights abuses, which he greatly emphasizes. But when it comes down to Palestinian human rights abuses, he ignores it. He also ignores Lebanon's, Syria's and Jordan's human rights abuses towards Palestinians, which shows you how biased this book is. The author believes that the first Intifada was "largely non-violent" (sure, perhaps when compared to the second Intifada, where suicide bombing was a weapon of choice) but Israel's response he calls a "brutal repression." Yet the author refuses to mention Palestinians' own brutal repression towards their own people, like when hundreds of Palestinian civilians suspected of "collaborating" with Israel were tortured and executed by Palestinian militants during the first Intifada.
But providing such detail would ruin the author's squeaky-clean image of Palestinians, which brings us to another fine virtue the author exemplifies; Hypocrisy. He accuses Joan Peters' book Time Immortal of being a "colossal hoax" where "sources were mangled, key numbers in demographic study falsified, and large swaths plagiarized from Zionist propaganda." Sounds to me like he learned a lot from Peters' alleged tactics, since Finkelstein himself mangles sources. For example, he quotes from Benny Morris (also a controversial author who calls himself a "new scholar" and who has been accused of twisting facts and even fabricating them) who Finkelstein calls a racist psychopath! Yet Finkelstein has no problems quoting "facts" from a racist psychopath. Ironically enough, this racist psychopath later complained that Finkelstein misused his sources through selective quoting!
The second half of the book deals specifically with Alan Dershowitz (not exactly an acclaimed scholar either) and his book "The Case for Israel." Here, the author's role here is to expose Dershowitz as a complete fraud. I admit that when one looks at the content of his analysis at face value, it looks very impressive. Yet when you read very closely, you will notice that the author uses a very simple method of boldly dismissing everything and anything Dershowitz wrote and replacing it all with his own personally revised "corrections" - through selective sources and quoting, of course. The author's superbly confident, often arrogant, and bully-like tone is sure to convince anyone of anything he writes. His attempt to prove that Dershowitz plagiarized is not all that fantastic either; whenever Dershowitz quotes from Peters, he uses quotation marks or citations, or at least makes some sort of attributions in one way or another.
So there you have it: A spectacular one-sided book on the Israel-Palestine conflict. If you are looking for an all-out attack on the State of Israel to serve for your hungry appetite, Mr. Finkelstein will provide you with the most satisfying meal.
Book Description
This digital document is an article from Arab Studies Quarterly (ASQ), published by Thomson Gale on January 1, 2006. The length of the article is 1743 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Norman G. Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History.(Book review)
Author: Stephanie Farmer
Publication:
Arab Studies Quarterly (ASQ) (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2006
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Page: 59(4)
Article Type: Book review
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Customer Reviews:
Praise for malice and dishonesty.......2007-07-08
Norman Finkelstein wrote a misleading and malicious book called "Beyond Chutzpah." In this review, Stephanie Farmer praises the book.
According to Farmer, Finkelstein "shows how the reiteration of previously discredited scholarship is not only a matter of intellectual sloth but broadly captures the more fundamental lack of evidentiary rigor required when one is defending Israel." That's pretty funny, especially when Finkelstein simply brands rather simple truths about Israel as "previously discredited scholarship." In addition, I think that evidentiary rigor might be useful for those who wish to attack Israel.
Farmer says that "according to Finkelstein, claims of anti-Semitism are recklessly (but nonetheless maliciously) deployed against those questioning (and in some cases) condemning criminal actions perpetrated by the state of Israel." And that the charge of anti-Semitism "effectively shields Israel against any and all criticisms." But I haven't seen any shielding of Israel from criticism, and I think that Finkelstein is simply trying to use such an argument to defend reckless, malicious, and anti-Semitic statements on his part.
Finkelstein makes some preposterous and strongly worded charges against Joan Peters and Alan Dershowitz for their books about Israel. But rather than admit that what Finkelstein says is at best controversial and at worst simply libelous, Farmer implies that Finkelstein is right. She calls Peters' case "a fraud" although much of what Peters says has not even been seriously challenged, let alone refuted.
This article reads like a sort of tantrum. It's hard to take it seriously. Maybe it would be better if Farmer were to calm down and try to write something sincere and sensible.
Book Description
This digital document is an article from National Catholic Reporter, published by Thomson Gale on October 14, 2005. The length of the article is 2146 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Seeing through the 'new anti-Semitism': Norman Finkelstein critiques Israel's human rights record and Alan Dershowitz's defense of it.(Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History)(Book Review)
Author: Neve Gordon
Publication:
National Catholic Reporter (Magazine/Journal)
Date: October 14, 2005
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 41
Issue: 44
Page: 18(2)
Article Type: Book Review
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Customer Reviews:
Well-researched and much needed book.......2006-08-27
Finkelstein is nothing if not thorough in making his case against those who support Israel as a country that can do no harm/wrong, and who use the epithet of anti-Semite ( or self-hating Jew )for anyone who dares to criticize any of its actions.
He quotes from well respected human rights groups, including the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights (B'Tselem) ,Human Rights Watch, Physicians for Human Rights -Israel, and makes the case against torture in Israel. I found some of those reports too painful to read,("Israel's Abu Ghraib) having lost many of my family in the Holocaust.
Finkelstein bravely takes on those who claim that there is a growth in anti-Semitism, showing that it is mainly used " to assail Israel's critics", that the claim is in some cases clearly anti-black, and that in other cases it excuses those who support Israel, such as Falwell, Robertson and other Christian Fundamentalists, some of whom are in actuality anti-Semitic, and are using Israel as a means for their own ends .
He also takes on Alan Dershowitz' book, "The Case For Israel" and carefully takes the book apart, paragraph by paragraph.For example , Dershowitz's often-used "blame the victim" in Arab civilian deaths , citing alleged "human shields", ambulances disguised as actual terrorist engines, etc. to show the culpability of the Arabs in their civilian deaths is countered by Finkelstein in reports from human rights organizations , such as B'Tselem, and shown to be false.
No wonder Dershowitz wanted this book trashed!
I would definitely reccommnend this book, particularly for Jewish readers who care about Israel's future and worry about its policies as being counter-productive to itself and to peace in the Middle East.
Garbage.......2006-02-25
This is Neve Gordon's review of Norman Finkelstein's awful book, "Beyond Chutzpah."
This book made claims that were so outrageous that Alan Dershowitz pointed out that there might be legal ramifications in publishing it as it stood. But Gordon dismisses all this as an attempt to interfere with "academic freedom!" That is dishonesty on Gordon's part.
There has indeed been a rise in anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic propaganda from the "Left," but both Finkelstein and Gordon attempt to pretend it just isn't so. And Gordon agrees with a totally preposterous comment by Finkelstein to the effect that the rhetoric of the new anti-Semitism is used as a political tool to "ward off and delegitimize all criticism of Israel." And that, on top of that, not only has Israel been immunized from legitimate criticism (Israel in fact has not been immunized from legitimate criticism nor has it been immunized from illegitimate criticism, both of which it has received in more than ample amounts), criticism of Israel's "assault" on international law has been deflected as well!
If you can believe that, you can believe anything.
Even Gordon finds a couple of things about Finkelstein's trashy book to criticize. He points out that Israel has in no way led an unprecedented assault on international law. An assault, yes, but unprecedented, no. Very funny.
More seriously, Gordon mistrusts Finkelstein's implicit claim that the Jews are to blame for anti-Semitism. Citing Sartre, Gordon explains that "no one is to blame for anti-Semitism except the anti-Semites." And he quotes Sartre in explaining that "anti-Semitism 'precedes the facts that call it forth,' so that even if Israel were the most law-abiding state on this planet, anti-Semitism would still exist." Okay, that's worth a star. And I gave this article one star.
Gordon wonders about academic honesty. He certainly should! But the person he questions is Dershowitz! And he wonders how "a prominent professor holding an endowed chair at a leading university can publish a book whose major claims are false." But the anti-Zionists are the culprits here: they've had professors with endowed chairs publish some of the most anti-intellectual trash I have ever seen. Gordon says that Finkelstein is arguing for a moral Israel. That's a joke.
My concern is not about Israel, but about truth, scholarship, and academic honesty. This article mocks all of them.
Book Description
This book covers all species residing or appearing regularly in the twenty-six states east of the Mississippi River. Places for bird finding in each state are chosen to show the widest variety of regular species, seasonal concentrations of birds and migratory movements, and the best representations of birdlife in the vicinities of metropolitan areas and leading vacation centers. Also included are listings of National Parks and National Wildlife Refuges, many state and municipal parks, preserves, and numerous public or privately owned sanctuaries and nature centers.
Books:
- The Parent's Pharmacy: Preventing and Treating Childhood Illnesses
- The Parenting Survival Kit: How to make it Tyrough the Parenting Years
- The Perfect Parents Handbook
- The Self-Calmed Baby: A Revolutionary New Approach to Parenting Your Infant
- The Widow's Resource: How to Solve the Financial and Legal Problems That Occur Within the First Six to Nine Months of Your Husband's Death
- Tod lo que hacemos sin saber por qué
- Type II Diabetes: Your Healthy Living Guide : Tips, Techniques, and Practical Advice for Living Well With Diabetes
- Volver Al Amor
- Waldorf Parenting Handbook
- Weight Wisdom: Affirmations to Free You from Food and Body Concerns
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- Merce Cunningham: Fifty Years
- Letters From a Skeptic: A Son Wrestles with His Father's Questions about Christianity
- Histoire De L'opera En Europe Avant Lully Et Scarlatti
- La Tia Julia Y El Escribidor/ Aunt Julia And the Scriptwritter
- History: Fiction or Science
- Manual of Clinical Microbiology
- Many Mansions: The Edgar Cayce Story on Reincarnation
- 1001 Cartoon-Style Illustrations
- Jane Brody's Nutrition Book: A Lifetime Guide to Good Eating for Better Health and Weight Control by
- The Physiological Ecology of Woody Plants
General
| Parenting & Families
| Subjects
| Books
